How to consider situating without signifying, or maybe how to place another without them becoming a commodity. Are we to assume one mode fits all within academic dioramas, or is it one size will get you by as the standard for excellence in scholarly production units? What is it to exclude types of writing, or limit inclusion of certain types into journals? Why do we continue to believe in the failed fairy tale of definitional identity as an answer, when all that happens is the reinforcement of the other? There is this phenomena in this (queer) community (is there a community that I do not know about? One of the questions ought to be, is; what is it when there is an act of piracy by the privileged using academic writing within a logocentric context, to speak of or about queers or "bi" or "trans" issues and or individuals?
Vol. 3 Issue 3/4, p63-69 7p