ISBN:

Accession Number:

Abstract:

Evidence continues to accumulate supporting an innate basis of human sexual identity as male or female. Selective mustering of these particles of data can congeal into a compelling argument. Plyers of the law trade present one side of an argument in their legal brief. The reader is overwhelmed by its forceful logic and inevitable conclusions. The reader is dumbfounded that there is an opposition. Until reading the opponent's brief. That is law. This is science. A peer-reviewed journal is a vehicle for balanced presentation of data with conclusions-not outstripping the evidence. This lengthy article on gender identity is a brief cross-dressed as science. It set out to "pass" but it was "read."

Notes:

Vol. 9 Issue 1, p45-47 3p